Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences)

A Critical Examination of the Modern DualisticPerspective in Theories of Humanities and Social Sciences

Document Type : Research

Author

Mehdi Nourian

PhD Candidate in Cultural Sociology, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran,

https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2025.50550.2894
Abstract
Abstract
The present article seeks to critically analyze the dominant dualistic perspective in most theories of the humanities and social sciences through an interdisciplinary approach inspired by psychoanalysis, sociology, and theoretical mysticism. To do this, it first gives a psychoanalytic narrative of the emergence of the subject. Then, it argues that the main problem of the dualistic perspective is that through the amnesia of the moment of separation from being, subjectivity—as a secondary, temporary, yet necessary form of knowledge—illusively replaces true ontology, and then attempts to explain external reality based on the subject-object dualism. The article then, relying on the later works of Simmel, refutes the idea that the experience of unity with being is impossible in the post-Oedipal world. This becomes possible through Simmel’s neo-Kantian reading of Kant’s idea that the subject-object boundary can be suspended in the aesthetic realm. Accordingly, Simmel considers the suspension of the dualistic subject-object relationship feasible at the social and political levels as well. The article further introduces the concept of “transgression” and attempts to explore the suspension of this dualism through the sociological concepts of “I” and “me” from Mead, as well as through a mystical reading based on the thoughts of Ibn Arabi and Rumi.

Keywords

Subject-Object Dualism
Modern Dualism
Transgression
I
Pantheism
Disenchantment
Subjects
 
Brown, Norman O. (1985), Life against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History, Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
Cassirer, Ernst (1981), Kant’s Life and Thought, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Craib, Ian. (1997), “Social constructionism as a social psychosis”, Sociology, vol. 31, no. 1, 1-15.
Freud, Sigmund (1961), Civilization and Its Discontents, in: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, James Strachey (ed. and trans.), Hogarth Press.
Frisby, David (1992), “The Study of Society”, in: Simmel and Since: Essays on Georg Simmel’s Social Theory, London and New York: Routledge.
Ibn ʿArabī, Muḥyī al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī (2006), Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam, Mohammad Ali Movahed and Samad Movahed (trans., commen., and analy.), Tehran: Nashr-e Karnameh.
Lacan, Jacques (1977), “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function”, in: Écrits: A Selection, Alan Sheridan (trans.), London: Routledge.
Marx, Karl (2007), Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Martin Milligan (trans.), New York: Dover.
Mawlavi (Rūmī), Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad (1999), Kulliyāt-i Shams (Dīvān-i Kabīr), Badiʿ al-Zamān Forūzānfar (ed. and notes), Tehran: Amirkabir.
Mawlavi (Rūmī), Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad (2007), Masnavī-yi Maʿnavī (Based on Nicholson’s edition and the 677 AH Konya manuscript), Tehran: Āshiyān Publications.
Mead, George. H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morris-Reich, A. (2005), “From autonomous subject to free individual in Simmel and Lacan”, History of European ideas, vol. 31, no. 1, 103-127.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2000), The Birth of Tragedy, Douglas Smith (trans.), Oxford University Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2023), On the Genealogy of Morality, Gregory Maertz (ed.), Ian Johnston (trans.), Broadview Press.
Parsons, Talcott and Edward Shils (1962), General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Parsons, William B. (1999), The Enigma of the Oceanic Feeling: Revisioning the Psychoanalytic Theory of Mysticism, Oxford University Press.
Simmel, Georg (1971), “Social Forms and Inner Needs”, in: Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms, Donald N. Levine (ed.), Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Simmel, Georg (1978), The Philosophy of Money, Tom Bottomore and David Frisby (trans.), Boston: Routledge.
Simmel, Georg (1984), “On Love”, in: Georg Simmel on Women, Sexuality, and Love, Guy Oakes (trans.), New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Simmel, Georg (1997), “Religion”, in: Essays on Religion, Horst Jürgen Helle (trans.), Yale University Press.
Simmel, Georg (1997), “The Conflict of Modern Culture”, in: Essays on Religion, Horst Jürgen Helle (trans.), Yale University Press.
Weber, Max (1963), The Sociology of Religion, Beacon Press.
Wrong, Dennis H. (1961), “The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology”, American Sociological Review, vol. 26, no. 2, 183-193.

  • Receive Date 19 April 2025
  • Revise Date 25 May 2025
  • Accept Date 23 July 2025

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us