Document Type : Research

Author

Associate Professor, University of Tabriz

Abstract

This article tries to critically review Modern and Postmodern Philosophers: The End of History by Ali Moradkhani. The topic of Endism is one of many new issues that in the late twentieth century, especially with Fukuyama, has gained momentum in academic circles. This issue has been, explicitly or implicitly, stated in philosophy of modern and postmodern in this book, but the author wants to make clear it under the title of "end of history". This article consists of two parts: The first part of this article refers to the shortcomings of the content of the book such as the style of its writing and translation. In other words, much of the book is a translation of the sources of the book, not necessarily the author’s own ideas. The second part of the article considers formal shortcomings of book such as book cover, table of contents, references, endnotes, etc. We also propose some samples whenever necessary.

Keywords

Main Subjects

مراد خانی، علی (1392) پایانتاریخازنظرفلاسفهمدرنوپستمدرن، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی
سیم، استوارت (1391)دریدا و پایان تاریخ، ترجمه محسن محمودی، تهران: نشر افسون
اردبیلی، محمد مهدی و آزادی ، علی رضا (1393) «هگل، هایدگر و مسالۀ زمان» ، مجله پژوهشهای فلسفی دانشگاه تبریز، دوره 8، شماره 14، بهار و تابستان 1393، صفحه 49-96  
Francis Fukuyama (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. Free Press
Francis Fukuyama, "The End of History?", The National Interest (Summer 1989
Dale, Eric Michael (2014) Hegel, the End of History, and the Future, (Cambridge University Press)
Perkins, Robert L.(1984) History and System: Hegel's Philosophy of History, History and System: Hegel's Philosophy of History ,volume 7 of Proceedings of the ... sessions of the Hegel Society of America, Hegel Society of America SUNY series in Hegelian studies