Document Type : Research

Authors

1 1PhD Student in Western Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

2 Professorof Western Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba’i University, A Member of the Iranian Council for Reviewing Books and Texts in Human Sciences

Abstract

Deleuze's philosophical commentary on Spinoza is a critically important work because its conclusions provide the foundations for Deleuze's later metaphysical speculations on the nature of power, the body, difference and singularities. Deleuze and Spinoza is the first book to examine Deleuze's philosophical assessment of Spinoza and appraise his arguments concerning the Absolute, the philosophy of mind, epistemology and moral and political philosophy. The author respects and disagrees with Deleuze the philosopher and suggests that his arguments not only lead to eliminativism and a Hobbesian politics, but also they cast a mystifying spell. Opposed to feminist philosophers who find Deleuze's theories practical for the third wave feminism, Gillian Howie proposes that a turning to Marxism and critical theory would be an answer.

Keywords

Main Subjects

دلوز، ژیل، (1391الف)، فلسفه چیست، ترجمة زهره اکسیری و پیمان غلامی، تهران: رخداد نو.
دلوز، ژیل (1391ب)، نیچه و فلسفه، ترجمة عادل مشایخی، تهران: نشر نی.
Braidotti, Rosi (2012), Nomadic Theory: The Portable RosiBraidotti, New York: Columbia University Press.
Browne, Victoria and Daniel Whistler (2017), “Gillian Howie’s Philosophies of Embodied Practice”, in: On the Feminist Philosophy of Gillian Howie: Materialism and Mortality, Victoria Browne and Daniel Whistler (eds.), UK and USA: Bloomsbury.
Bruza, P. D., D. W. Song, and, K. F. Wong (2000), “Aboutness from a commonsense perspective”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 51, no. 12.
Deleuze, Gilles (1994), Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton, USA: Columbia University Press.
Delanda, Manuel (2002), Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy, London, NY: Continuum.
Gatens, Moira and Genevieve Lloyd (1999), Collective Imaginings: Spinoza Past and Present, London and New York: Routledge.
Hodge, Joanna (2017), “Between Negative Dialectics and Sexual Difference: Generative Conjunctures in the Thinking of Gillian Howie”, in: On the Feminist Philosophy of Gillian Howie: Materialism and Mortality, Victoria Browne and Daniel Whistler (eds.), UK and USA: Bloomsbury.
Howie, Gillian (2002), Deleuze and Spinoza: Aura of Expressionism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Howie, Gillian (2008), “Becoming-Woman: A Flight into Abstraction”, Deleuze Studies, vol. 2, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Howie, Gillian (2010), Between Feminism and Materialism: A Question of Method, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howie, Gillian (2012), “Nonidentity, Negative Experience, and the Pre-Reflective Cogito”, European Journalof Philosophy, vol. 23.
Irigaray, Luce (1993), An Ethics of Sexual Difference, trans. Carolyn Burke, London: Athlone.
Jarvis, Simon (1998), Adorno: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jaspers, Karl (1974), Spinoza, London: Harvest.
Joy, Morny (2017), “Reflections on Living up to Death”, in: On the Feminist Philosophy of Gillian Howie: Materialism and Mortality, Victoria Browne and Daniel Whistler (eds.), UK and USA: Bloomsbury.
Patton, Paul (1998), Deleuze and the Political, London: Routledge.
Protevi, John (2001), Political Physics: Deleuze, Derrida, and the Body Politics, London: Athlone.
Whistler, Daniel (2014), “Howie’s between Feminism and Materialism and the Critical History of Religions”, Sophia, vol. 53, no. 1.
Yovel, Yirmiyahu (1991), “The Infinite Mode and Natural Laws in Spinoza”, in: God and Nature: Spinoza's Metaphysics,Yirmiyahu Yovel (ed.), Leiden: E. J. Brill.