Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of TEFL, English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 MA Student of TEFL, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Critical evaluation of language learning books is a vital step in a successful curriculum. The need is especially conspicuous for newly-published materials. Consequently, the present paper tried to explore and evaluate the ESP book entitled English for the Students of Sociology recently written by Mohammad Hossein Kesharvarz and Musa Nushi Kochaksaraie and published by SAMT in 2016. The paper critically examined the overall pedagogical value and suitability of the book. To achieve this goal, the book was evaluated based on Mahmoodi and Ahmadi Safa’s (2015) model. Semi-structured interviews based on the model were also conducted to delve into content teachers’ perspectives who were specialists in sociology. Seven experts in the field of sociology from Bu-Ali Sina, Ilam and Guilan universities were interviewed by the researchers. The results showed that the new book has improved quite dramatically compared to the previous book published by SAMT. Moreover, the findings revealed that in spite of some deficiencies in the selection of the activities, exercises, and texts, the book is suitable and can be used as an ESP source. The researchers provide some useful suggestions for improving the shortcomings of the book.

Keywords

Main Subjects

محمودی، محمدهادی و محمد احمدی صفا (1393)، «ارزش‌یابی الگو ـ محور کتاب‌های انگلیسی برای اهداف خاص (ESP)»، پژوهش‌نامة انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی، س 14، ش 3.
Alderson, J. C. (2000), Assessing Reading, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amirian, Z. and M. Tavakoli (2009), “Reassessing ESP Courses Offered to Engineering Studies in Iran, English for Specific Purposes World, vol. 8, no. 23.
Amirian, Z. and M. Tavakoli (2009), Reassessing the ESP Courses Offered to Engineering Students in Iran (A Case Study),.
Ausubel, D. P. (2000), The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: a Cognitive View, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Baleghizadeh, S. and A. H. Rahimi (2011), “Evaluation of an ESP Textbook for the Students of Sociology”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 2, no. 5.
Carrell, P. L. (1998), “Can Reading Strategies be Successfully Taught? The Language Teacher Online”:.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995), Choosing your Coursebook, Oxford: Heinemann.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007), Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T. and M. J. St. John (1998), Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ebadi, S. and Z. Naderifarjad (2015), “Evaluation of EAP Textbooks: A Comparison between SAMT English for Medical Students and Oxford English for Career”, Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, vol. 2, no. 3.
Ellis, R. (1997), “The Empirical Evaluation of Language Teaching Materials”, ELT Journal, vol. 51.
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. R. (2010), “Teachers Voice vs. Students Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach to English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Iran”, English Language Teaching, vol. 3, no. 1.
Farhady, H. (2006), “On the Specificity of Purpose in ESP, The Proceeding of the Second International Conference in Linguistics and Applied Linguistics”, in: H. Farhady (ed.), Twenty-Five Years of Living with Applied Linguistics, Collection of Articles, Rahnama Press.
Graves, M. et al. (1994), Essentials of Classroom Teaching: Elementary Reading Methods, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hutchinson, T. and A. Waters (1987), English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jonassen, D. (2004), Learning to Solve Problems: an Instructional Design Guide, San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Karimi, L. et al. (2013), “Agricultural Extension and Rural Development ESP Textbook Evaluation in Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran”, Journal of English Linguistics Research, vol. 2, no. 1.
Keshavarz, M. H. and M. N. Kochaksaraie (2016), English for the Students of Sociology, Tehran: SAMT.
Maleki, A. and M. Kazemi (2012), “The Evaluation and Comparison of two Most Widely Used Textbooks for Teaching English to the Iranian Students of Medicine”, The Iranian EFL Journal, vol. 8, no. 3.
Malone, T. W. (1981), “Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction”, Cognitive Science, vol. 4.
McDonough, J. and C. Shaw (2003), Materials and Methods in ELT, Oxford: Blackwell.
Riazi, A. M. (2003), “What Textbook Evaluation Schemes Tell Us? A Study of the Textbook Evaluation Schemes of Three Decades”, in: W. A. Renandya (ed.), Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching, Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Center.
Sangwine, S. J. and R. E. N. Horne (1998), The Colour Image Processing Handbook, UK: University of Reading.
Sheldon, L. (1988), “Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials”, ELT Journal, vol. 37.
Silva, F. (2002), “ESP Teaching for Learners in the Health Sciences Field”, American Journal of Nursing, vol. 1.
Sookchotirat, M. (2005), Reading: Learning Sooner, Teaching Well, Thailand: Nanmee.
Tajeddin, Z. (2005), “English for Business Communication”, Paper Presented in the First National ESP/EAP Conference, Tehran, Iran.