Document Type : Research

Authors

1 MA of Islamic Studies, Culture and Communication, Imam Sadiq University

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Al-Zahra University

Abstract

Cultural differences have always been regarded as significant in human social life. A comprehensive understanding of these differences plays an influential role in explaining and predicting interactions and communications between cultures and within them. Geert Hofstede’s theory of Dimensions of national Culture which is completely introduced in his prominent book titled Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind has been developing in the last three decades as a pioneer and influential theory for study of intercultural differences. In short, preparing a new realm in the field of interdisciplinary studies of culture and using limited dichotomies in recognizing national culture dimensions are among this theory’s privileges while historicity, underestimating social dynamics and diversity, the failure to utilize a consistent and strong theoretical foundation, and ecological fallacy are regarded as its main limitations. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

فیاض، ابراهیم (1389)، تعامل دین، فرهنگ، و ارتباطات: نگاهی مردم‌شناختی، تهران: شرکت چاپ و نشر بین‌الملل.
کوش، دنی (1389)، مفهوم فرهنگ در علوم اجتماعی، ترجمۀ فریدون وحیدا، تهران: سروش.
گادیکانست، ویلیام (1383)، پیوند تفاوت‌ها؛ راهنمای ارتباط کارآمد بین گروهی، ترجمۀ علی کریمی (مله) و مسعود هاشمی، تهران: تمدن اسلامی.
گادیکانست، ویلیام و دیگران (1385)، «نظریه‌پردازی دربارۀ ارتباطات میان‌فرهنگی»، ترجمۀ پیروز ایزدی، رسانه، ش 3، دورۀ 17.
لوتمان، یوری و بوریس اوسپنسکی (1390)، «درباب سازوکار نشانه‌شناختی فرهنگ»،در: نشانه‌شناسی فرهنگی، ترجمۀ تینا امراللهی و دیگران، زیرنظر فرزان سجودی، تهران: نشر علم.
نات، راگو (1387)، مدیریت تطبیقی، ترجمۀ عباس منوریان، تهران: مهربان نشر.
هوفستده، گیرت (1388)، فرهنگ‌ها و سازمان‌ها: نرم‌افزار ذهن، ترجمۀ محمد اعرابی و دیگران، تهران: نشر علم.
 
Ailon, G. (2008), “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Culture’s Consequences in a Value Test of its own Design”, Academy of Management Review, no. 33.
Berniker, E. and D. E. McNabb (2006), “Dialectical Inquiry: A Structured Qualitative Research Method”, The Qualitative Report, vol. 11, no. 4.
Brewer, P. and S. Venaik (2014), The Ecological Fallacy in National Culture Research, Organization Studies, vol. 35, no. 7.
Gerhart, B. and M. Fang (2005), “National Culture and Human Resource Management: Assumptions and Evidence”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 16, no. 6.
Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (1991), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, London: McGraw-Hill UK. 
Hofstede, G. (2002), “Dimensions do not Exist: A Reply to Brendan McSweeney”, Human Relations, vol. 55, no. 11.
Hofstede, G. (2002), Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd edition) Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
Hofstede, G. (2003), What is Culture? A Reply to Baskerville, Accounting, Organizations and Society, no. 28.
Hofstede, G. and M. H. Bond (1984), “Hofstede's Culture Dimensions: An Independent Validation Using Rokeach's Value Survey”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4.
Hofstede, G. and M. Minkov (2010), “Long- Versus Short-Term Orientation: New Perspectives”, Asia Pacific Business Review, vol. 16, no. 4.
Hofstede, G. and M. Minkov (2013), “Values Survey Module 2013 Manual”:.
Hofstede, G. et al. (2010), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival.
Jandt, Fred Edmund (1995), Intercultural Communication: an Introduction, Michigan: Sage Publications.
Kuhn, T. (2000), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Litvin, Stephen W. et al. (2004), “Cross-Cultural Tourist Behavior: A Replication and Extension Involving Hofstede’s Uncertainty Avoidance Dimension”, International Journal of Tourism Research, no. 6.
McSweeney, B. (2002 a), “Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith; a Failure of Analysis”, Human Relations.
McSweeney, B. (2002 b), “The Essentials of Scholarship: A Reply to Geert Hofstede”, Human Relations, vol. 55, no. 11.
Minkov, M. (2011). “Cultural Differences in a Globalizing World”, Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Minkov, M. (2017), A Revision of Hofstede’s Model of National Culture: Old Evidence and New Data from 56 Countries, Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, vol. 25, no. 2.
Minkov, M. and G. Hofstede (2011), “The Evolution of Hofstede’s Doctrine”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, vol. 18, no. 1.
Minkov, M. et al. (2015), “Do Different National Samples Yield Similar Dimensions of National Culture?”, Cross Cultural Management, vol. 2, no. 2.
Minkov, M. et al. (2017), A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, vol. 52, no. 3.
Minkov, M. et al. (January 01, 2017), “A Revision of Hofstede's Individualism-Collectivism Dimension: A New National Index from a 56-Country Study”, Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, vol. 24, no. 3.
Samovar, L. et al. (2012), “Communicating Between Cultures”, 8th Edition, Boston: Wands Worth Cengage Learning.
Schwartz, S. and H. Beyond (1994), “Individualism/ Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values”, in: Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Methods, and Applications, U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, and G. Yoon (eds.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.