Teaching Persian for Academic Purposes: Evaluating the Textbook of  Nabz-e Zendegi (Pulse of Life)  for International Students Based on Miekley’s Checklist

Vakilifard, Amirreza; Ahmadi Khalkhali, Nadia

doi:10.30465/crtls.2020.25404.1530

Teaching Persian for Academic Purposes: Evaluating the Textbook of Nabz-e Zendegi (Pulse of Life) for International Students Based on Miekley’s Checklist

Document Type : Research

Authors

Amirreza Vakilifard ¹

Nadia Ahmadi Khalkhali ²

¹ Associate Professor, Department of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

² Master of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2020.25404.1530

Abstract

It would be significant to analyze the content of these educational resources to see whether they are in line with the students’ needs. Miekley’s (2005) checklist is considered an effective criterion for the selection and analysis of language teaching materials. The participants were (a) 25 Persian language teachers teaching Persian to non-Persian language learners and (b) 32 non-Persian language learners, majoring in different medicine sciences in Iranian medical universities. They were asked to analyze the textbook entitled as “Pulse of Life” (Nabze Zendegi) (1385) based on categories in Miekley’s (2005) proposed checklist. Descriptive statistics were employed to separately analyze the data of two groups; the results obtained were compared and contrasted. Given the first section, namely, textbook, teacher participants claimed that the textbook was structurally well-designed and it included attractive content and sub-contents as well as relevant vocabularies and grammar structures. However, student volunteers believed that tasks and activities along with grammar structures and vocabularies were not appropriately presented in this textbook. Two groups of participants perceived that the sub-sections of general characteristics, background information, and methodology guide were not suitable. However, they considered the context section appropriate. Teachers graded the vocabulary subsection, and the students ranked the grammar subsection in the second status. Subsections of passage attraction and book appearance were ordered in the third rank. The findings of this investigation could be helpful for researchers and teachers in evaluating the efficiency and appropriateness of instructional resources, possibly available in the instructional resources of teaching Persian to non-Persian language learners.

Keywords

Teaching Persian Language

Non-Persian Language Learners

Teaching Persian for Academic Purposes

Nabz-e Zendegi (Pulse of Life) textbook

Textbook Evaluation Checklist

Subjects

Linguistics and Ancient Languages

ذوالفقاری، ح.، م. غفاری، و ب. محمودی بختیاری (1388)، فارسی بیاموزیم، تهران: مدرسه.

غریبی، ا. (1395)، «چهارچوب‌های ارزیابی موادآموزشی: معرفی و مقایسۀ موردی دو چهارچوب کانینگزورث و لیتل‌جان»، مجموعه‌مقالات اولین همایش واکاوی منابع آزفا، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

وکیلی‌فرد، ا.، ا. میرزایی حصاریان، و ن. احمدی خلخالی (1398)، «فارسی برای اهداف دانشگاهی: تحلیل کتاب فارسی ویژۀ علوم اجتماعی»، پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، ش 44.

وکیلی‌فرد، ا.، پ. حیدری خسرو، و ف. جنتی‌راد (1397)، «ارزیابی مجموعۀ فارسی بیاموزیم در چهارچوب شاخص‌های گزینش منابع آموزشی براساس انگارۀ ’مک‌دانوف و شاو‘ (2003)»، مجموعه‌مقالات دهمین همایش بین‌المللی زبان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

وکیلی‌فرد، ا.، ز. صدیقی‌فر، و م. گله‌داری (1395)، نبض زندگی، گسترش واژگان و درک متون نیمه‌تخصصی زبان فارسی در حوزۀ علوم پزشکی ـ سطح میانی، قزوین: دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی.

Azarnoosh, M. and M. Ganjy (2014), “ESP Book Evaluation: The Case of Management Course Book”, International Journal of Secondary Education, vol. 2, no. 4.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995), Choosing your Course Book, Oxford: Heinemann Oxford.

Dudley-Evans, A. and M. St. John (1998), Developments in ESP: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchinson, T. and A. Waters (1991), English for Specific Purposes, United King: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchinson, T. and E. Torres (1994), The Textbook as an Agent of Change, ELT Journal, vol. 48, no. 4.

Jordan, R. R. and A. Matthews (2009), English for Specific Purposes, United King: British Council.

Littlejohn, A. (2011), “The Analysis of Language Teaching Materials: Inside the Trojan Horse”, in: Materials Development in Language Teaching (2^nd ed., 179-211), B. Tomlinson (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McDonough, J. and C. Shaw (2003), Materials and Methods in ELT, Oxford: Blackwell.

Miekley, J. (2005), “ESL Textbook Evaluation Checklist”, The Reading Matrix, vol. 5, no. 2.

Mukundan, J., V. Nimehchisalem, and R. Hajimohammadi (2011), “Developing an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist: A Focus Group Study”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 1, no. 12.

Richards, J. C. (2013),“Creativity in Language Teaching”, Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, vol. 1, no. 3.

Richards, J. C. (2001), Curriculum Development in Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salataci, R., and A. Akyel (2002), “Possible Effects of Strategy Instruction on L1 and L2 Reading”, Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 14, no. 1.

Tomlinson, B. (2003), “Materials Evaluation”, in: Developing Materials for Language Teaching, B. Tomlinson (ed.), United King: Continuum.

Yaghoubi Nezhad, H., I. Atarodi, and M. Khalili (2013), “A Checklist-Based Evaluative and Comparative of ESP Books: The Case of Mechanical Engineering”, Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, vol. 2, no. 2.