Document Type : Research

Author

Professor of Economics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Understanding the logic behind the success and failure in economic growth, and institutional and global arrangements is the subject of this book. Identifying growth’s binding constraints and the need for finding solutions for development issues according to the circumstances of countries is an alternative approach to this book on development. This paper aims at evaluating “One Economics, Many Recipe” in presenting an initiative for economic growth and development. Analytical-descriptive method is used in reviewing the book and conducting methodological assessment. The results indicated the advantages and challenges of the arguments put forwarded by the book. Among the advantages is the consideration of each country's circumstances in growth policy, the lack of one size fits all for economic policies for development, challenging the universalism of neoclassical teachings, the distinction between ignition of growth and its sustainability, and questioning of the exaggerating in the benefits of trade liberalization. Among the challenges are using the prescription on the title of the translated book, problems in implementing the growth diagnostic method, utilizing qualitative methods instead of quantitative in growth diagnosis in practice, neglecting policies and measures for the second stage in growth sustainability, and methodological assessment of growth diagnosis.

Keywords

Main Subjects

اکبرزاده، امین، مصیب پهلوانی، و سیدحسین میرجلیلی (1397)، «مدیریت توسعه و رشد اقتصادی در ایران؛ تحلیلی بر تنگناهای رشد با رویکرد داده‌بنیاد»، فصل‌نامۀ علمی ـ پژوهشی پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، دورۀ 11، پیاپی 42.
رودریک، دنی (1395)، اقتصاد حکم می‌راند: صحت‌وسقم این علم ملال‌آور، ترجمۀ محمدرضا فرهادی‌پور، تهران: آشتیان.
رودریک، دنی (1397)، یک علم اقتصاد، تجویزهای بسیار، ترجمۀ هادی ورتابیان، تهران: پیک نور.
میرجلیلی، سیدحسین (1386)، «آمـوزه‌های مـکتـب تاریخی برای تحلیل اقتـصاد ایـران»، پژوهش‌نامۀ اقتصادی، دورۀ 7، پیاپی 26.
میرجلیلی، سیدحسین (1395)، چگونگی شناسایی تنگناهای رشد اقتصادی، تهران: مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
 
Felipe, J. and N. Usui (2008), “Rethinking the Growth Diagnostics Approach: Questions from the Practitioners”, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank, no.132.
Habermann, H. and P. Padrutt (2011), “Growth Diognostics: Strengths and Weaknesses of a Creative Analytical Framework to Identify Economic Growth Constraints in Developing countries”, Journal of Knowledge, Management, Economics and Information Technology, no. 7.
Hausmann, R. and B. Klinger (2008), “Growth Diagnostics in Peru”, Working Paper, Center for International Development, Harvard University, no. 181.
Hausmann, R., B. Klinger, and R. Wagner (2008), “Doing Growth Diagnostics in Practice: A Mind Book”, Working Paper, Center for International Development at Harvard University, no.177.
Hausmann, R., D. Rodrik, and A. Velasco (2005), “Growth Diagnostics”, Available at:
<https://www.growth lab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growth-diagnostics.pdf>.
Leipziger, D. and R. Zagha (2006), “Getting Out of the Rut”, Finance and Development, International Monetary Fund, vol. 43, no. 1.
Mahdavi, A. and H. Majderezaee (2012), “The Fundamental Impediments of Economic Growth in Iran: An H-R-V Model”, Iranian Economic Review, vol. 16, no. 31.
Rodriguez, F. (2005), “Comment on Hausmann and Rodrik”, Available at:
Rodrik, D. (2007), “One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth”, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2010), “Diagnostics before Prescription”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 24, no. 3.
Rodrik, D. (2012), “Why We Learn Nothing from Regressing Economic Growth on Policies”, Seoul Journal of Economics, vol. 25, no. 2.
Sartor, O. (2007), “An Outline and Critique of Growth Diagnostics as a Response to the Policy Vacuum Left by the Washington Consensus”, Seminar Paper in Development Economics, Institute of Public Economics, Humboldt University, Berlin.