Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences)

Critique and redefinition book of the descriptive glossary of Inlay

Document Type : Research

Authors

Samira Arab 1
Seyed Abdolmajid Sharifzadeh 2

1 Research Expert Institute of Cultural Heritage, Tourism; PhD of Analytical and Comparative History of Islamic Art, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor and Faculty Member Institute of Cultural Heritage, Tourism, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2023.39599.2484
Abstract
The present article criticizes the "descriptive glossary of inlay" by Nasrin Tabatabai with a critical descriptive approach. The book was written in 2003. In this regard, the formal and structural aspects of the book in terms of observing the principles of scientific writing as well as content in terms of the importance of the content and what it is have been studied. In a situation where library studies on inlay  are few and with ambiguities, the writing of sources, although with shortcomings, have spiritual values for inlaying. In this book, the author has been able to collect and describe the specialized vocabulary of inlay for the first time, which is valuable and admirable; but at the same time, there are shortcomings in the presentation method, , insufficient and incomplete descriptions in the definitions of specialized words and terms, and the lack of some necessary words. Formally, in terms of writing style, citation system, non-Iranianization of some words, etc. can be seen in the book. Also, in terms of content, there are problems such as the lack of a precise demarcation between the definitions of some entries, the presentation of some short and incomplete definitions, the lack of some necessary words, the lack of proper references and the lack of a list. This research, in addition to explaining the deficiency, has also tried to redefine the words.

Keywords

Descriptive Glossary
inlay
Make Inlay
Stick Inlay
Criticism
Redefining

Subjects

Arab, Samira (2015), A Comparative Study of the Aesthetics of Safavid and Qajar Inlay Patterns, Unpublished Master Thesis, Central Tehran: Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University.
Arab, Samira (2016), Visual Analysis of the Inlay Works of the Qajar Period in Tehran, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Central Tehran: Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University.
Arab, Samira; Hatem, Gholam Ali and Fatemeh Shahroudi (1400), "Innovation in the method of Inlay the Qajar period", Negareh Scientific-Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, pp. 98-112.
Golriz, Mohammad Hadi (08/06/2021), Inlay Workshop, Tehran Golriz Professor, Samira Arab.
Golriz, Mohammad Hadi (21/08/2021), Golriz master's Inlay workshop, Tehran, Samira Arab.
Hashemi Minabad, Hassan (2007), "Collection of Ethnographic Articles", Second Office, Tehran: Academy of Persian Language and Literature.
Moin, Mohammad (2001), Farhang-e Farsi, 17th edition, below the entry of "words", Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Rozitalab, Gholamreza and Nahid Jalali (2003), Inlay Art, Vol. I, Tehran: Samat.
Seyyed Sadr, Seyyed Abolghasem (2002), Encyclopedia of Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol.
Sharifzadeh, Seyed Abdolmajid (2002), Geometry of Patterns 1, Ch III, Tehran: Sarv.
Tabatabai, Nasrin (2003), Descriptive Glossary of Inlay, Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Tafazoli, Ahmad (1999), History of Pre-Islamic Iranian Literature, Tehran: Sokhan.
Tahoori, Delshad (1986), The Art of Inlay in Iran, Tehran: Soroush.

  • Receive Date 27 March 2023
  • Revise Date 27 June 2023
  • Accept Date 29 July 2023

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us