نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار اقتصاد، عضو هیات علمی گروه اقتصاد دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران

2 دانش‎آموخت ه‎ی دکتری علوم اقتصادی دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مسئله‎ی اصلی این مقاله تبیین مؤلفه‎های اساسی مکتب اردولیبرالیسم آلمانی و نقدهای نظری و عملی وارد به آن و پرسش از نسبت میان اردولیبرالیسم و سایر مکاتب نئولیبرالیسم است. در این راستا ابتدا با استفاده از روش کتابخانه‎ای و مراجعه به آثار دست اول مهم‎ترین اندیشمندان اردولیبرالیسم از قبیل اویکن، روپکه و روستو و همچنین شارحین اصلی آنها مؤلفه‎های مکتب اردولیبرالیسم استخراج می‎گردد. این اصول عبارتند از: تقدم حقوق و نهادهای حقوقی بر اقتصاد و اصول تقویم‎گر و تنظیم‎گر آن، اصالت نظم رقابتی و اصالت یک دولت قوی در چارچوب قانون اساسی اقتصادی و اجرای سیاست نظم‎دهی با هدف صیانت از بازار. سپس به اختصار تحلیلی تطبیقی از نسبت این مکتب با مکتب شیکاگو و تنظیم‎گری ارائه خواهد شد. در نهایت نقدهای نظری وارده به اندیشه‎ها و اصول اساسی این مکتب و نقدهای عملی وارده به آثار و تبعات ناشی از اجرای سیاست‎گذاری اردولیبرال به تفصیل مورد بحث و تحلیل قرار می‎گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Critical Analysis of the Doctrines of Ordoliberalism (German School of Neoliberalism)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Aqil Hoseiny 1
  • Saeed Seyyedhoseinzade Yazdi 2

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

2 PhD of Economics, Imam Sadiq (A.) University, Qom, Iran

چکیده [English]

The main problem of this survey is to explain the basic components of the German school of Ordoliberalism and the theoretical and practical critiques of it, and to ask about the relationship between Ordoliberalism and other schools of neoliberalism. In this regard, first, using the library method and referring to the works of the most important thinkers of Ordoliberalism such as Eucken, Ropke, and Rustow, as well as their main commentators, the characteristics and principles of the Ordoliberalism school are extracted. These principles are the primacy of law and legal institutions over economic institutions, the constitutive and regulative principles, the superiority of the competitive order and the superiority of a strong state within the framework of the economic constitution and the implementation of ordnungspolitik (ordering policy) to preserve the market. A brief comparative analysis of the relationship between this school and the Chicago School is presented. Finally, the theoretical critiques of the ideas and basic principles of this school and the practical critiques of the effects and consequences of the implementation of the Ordoliberal policy are discussed in detail.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Neoliberalism
  • Ordoliberalism
  • Ordnungspolitik
  • Economic Constitution
  • Strong State
  • Competitive Order
فوکو, میشل (1389)، کتاب تولد زیست سیاست، ترجمه  رضا نجف­زاده، تهران: نشرنی.
دیتر لش (1379)، کتاب اقتصاد بازار اجتماعی؛ تجربه آلمان، ترجمه علی اکبر نیکو اقبال، تهران: سمت.
صمدی، هادی (1368)، چگونگی بازسازی آلمان پس از جنگ جهانی دوم، تهران: معا‌ونت‌ پژوهشی‌ و برنا‌مه‌ریزی دانشگا‌ه‌ تهران.
باری، کلارک( 1389)، اقتصاد سیاسی تطبیقی، ترجمه عباس حاتمی، کویر: تهران.
معرفی محمدی، عبدالحمید(1393)، علم اقتصاد و مسئله شناخت، قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
 
Araskewopoulos, Spyridon (2017): The German model of “Social Market Economy”. In George Bitros, N. C. Kyriazis (Eds.): Democracy and an open-economy world order: Springer, Cham, pp. 83–91.
Atkins. Ralf (May 2015) :Germany and Economics: Of  Rules and Order, The Economist.
Biebricher, Thomas; Vogelmann, Frieder (Eds.) (2017): The birth of austerity: German ordoliberalism and contemporary neoliberalism: Rowman & Littlefield
Birch, Kean (2017): A research agenda for neoliberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing (Elgar research agendas).
Blyth, Mark. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Böhm, Franz. [1958] 1980b. ‘Wettbewerbsfreiheit und Kartellfreiheit’. In Freiheit und Ordnung in der Marktwirtschaft, edited by Ernst Joachim Mestämcker, 233–62. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Böhm, Franz. [1958] 1980b. ‘Wettbewerbsfreiheit und Kartellfreiheit’. In Freiheit und Ordnung in der Marktwirtschaft, edited by Ernst Joachim Mestämcker, 233–62. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Böhm, Franz. [1966] 2010. ‘Extracts from Franz Böhm: “Private Law Society and Market Economy” ’. In The Theory of Capitalism in the German Economic.
Böhm, Franz. [1966] 2010. ‘Extracts from Franz Böhm: “Private Law Society and Market Economy” ’. In The Theory of Capitalism in the German Economic Tradition, edited by Peter Koslowski, 148–88. Berlin: Springer. [Truncated translation is also available in Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution,
Böhm, Franz. 1933. Wettbewerb und Monopolkampf. Berlin: Heymann.
Böhm, Franz. 1937. Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Berlin: Kohlhammer.
Böhm, Franz. 1961. ‘Demokratie und ökonomische Macht’. In Kartelle und Monopole im modernen Recht, edited by Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 1–24. Karlsruhe: Müller.
Burgin, A. (2012). The great persuasion. Harvard University Press.
Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism (London: Polity).
Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2014) The New Way of the World, London: Verso.
Eucken, W. (1951). The foundations of economics: History and theory in the analysis of economic reality. The University of Chicago Press.
Eucken, Walter. [1937] 1959. Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. Berlin: Springer
Eucken, Walter. [1948] 1989. ‘What Kind of Economic and Social System’? In Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution, edited by Alan Peacock and Hans Willgerodt, 27–45. London: Palgrave
Eucken, Walter. [1952] 2004. Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebert
Eucken, Walter. 1932. ‘Staatliche Strukturwandlungen und die Krise des Kapitalismus’. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 36: 297–321
Eucken, Walter. 1952. This Unsuccessful Age. London: Hodge.
Feld, Lars, Ekkehard Köhler, and Daniel Nientiedt. 2015. ‘Ordoliberalism, Pragmatism and the Eurozone Crisis: How the German Tradition Shaped Economic Policy in Europe’. European Review of International Studies 2 (3): 48–61.
Foucault, M. (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics, New York, NY: Picador, Cham.‏
Gerber, D. J. (1994). Constitutionalizing the economy: German neo-liberalism, competition law and the “new” Europe. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 42(1), 25–84.
Gerber, David. 1998. Law and Competition in the Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hagemann, Harald, " Germany, Economics in (20th Century)".The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2018). Third edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan
Jessop, B. (1982). The capitalist state. New York University Press New York.
Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place.
Jessop, B. (2002a). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state–theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452–472.
Jessop, B. (2002b). The future of the capitalist state. Polity.
Jessop, B. (2019). Ordoliberalism and Neoliberalization; Governing through Order or Disorder. Critical Sociology, 45(7–8), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519834068
Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2006). Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jessop. (2016). The heartlands of neoliberalism and the rise of the austerity state.
Maynard, Keynes John. "The end of laissez-faire." The Collected Writings of JM Keynes 9 (1926): 272-294.
Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds) (2009), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mont Pelerin ، https: //www.montpelerin.org/statement-of-armanc
Möschel, Wernhard. 1989. ‘Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View’. In German Neo-Liberals and the Social Market Economy, edited by Alan Peacock and Hans Willgerodt (with the assistance of Daniel Johnson), 142–59. London: Palgrave.
Müller-Armack, Alfred. 1976. Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik. Stuttgart: Paul Haupt.
Müller-Armack, Alfred. 1979. ‘Thirty Years of Social Market Economy’. In Economy and Development, edited by Josef Thesing, 146–62. Mainz: Hase und Köhler.
Peck, J. (2010), Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Röpke, W. (2014). A humane economy: The social framework of the free market. Open Road Media
Röpke, Wilhelm. [1923] 1959b. ‘Wirtschaftlicher Liberalismus und Staatsgedanke’. In Wilhelm Röpke, Gegen die Brandung, 42–46. Zürich: Rentsch.
Röpke, Wilhelm. [1942] 2009. The Social Crisis of Our Time. New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers.
Röpke, Wilhelm. [1950] 1982b. ‘Is the German Economic Policy the Right One’? In Standard Texts on the Social Market Economy – Two Centuries of Discussion, edited by Wolfgang Stützel, Christian Watrin, Hans Willgerodt and Karl Hohmann,37–48. Stuttgart: Fischer.
Röpke, Wilhelm. 1942. International Economic Disintegration. London: Hodge.
Röpke, Wilhelm. 1950a. Mass und Mitte. Zürich: Rentsch.
Röpke, Wilhelm. 1950b. Ist die Deutsche Wirtschaftspolitik richtig? Stuttgart: Kohlhammer
Rüstow, Alexander. 1942. ‘General Sociological Causes of the Economic Disintegration and Possibilities of Reconstruction’. In Afterword to Wilhelm Röpke, International Economic Disintegration, 267–83. London: Hodge.
The Economist, 2015. ‘Germany and Economics: Of rules and order’. Accessed 8 March 2017.
Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Economic Inquiry, 5(3), 224–232.
Vanberg, Viktor. 2015. ‘Ordoliberalism, Ordnungspolitik and the Reason of Rules’. European Review of International Studies 2 (3): 27–36.