Foreign Languages
Rohollah Ghasemi
Abstract
Christophe Balaÿ is one of the iranologists who has sacrificed their whole life to study Persian literature and the outcome is a book, entitled Genèse du roman persan modern, which has been translated to Persian by two Iranian university professors Mahvash Ghavimi and Nasrine-Dokht Khatat. ...
Read More
Christophe Balaÿ is one of the iranologists who has sacrificed their whole life to study Persian literature and the outcome is a book, entitled Genèse du roman persan modern, which has been translated to Persian by two Iranian university professors Mahvash Ghavimi and Nasrine-Dokht Khatat. The analysis of this translation and the comparison with the original text written in French can depict us the translators’ positioning facing with different challenges in text. And such a study could be interesting and helpful not only for professional translators but for students who aim to have a take a more profound look on this translation. We used Vinaya and Darbelent’s method because it is one of the most used and useful methods in this domain. In this article, we try to demonstrate which strategies the translators use in order to convey the meanings and to respect the structures of the text. In fact, the principal question we tried to answer to is: why translator chooses some structures and refuses the others? Finally, it is concluded that the product-based translation of this book seeks to attract Persian speakers and make them comprehend the materials as efficiently as possible.
Persian Language and Literature
Parsa Janbeh Saraie
Volume 18, Issue 2 , June 2018, , Pages 349-371
Abstract
As a communicative-epistemological concept, ambiguity is pivotal to any discussion of reading. Due to its roots in different fields of knowledge, as well as its dependence on age, genre, style, etc., ambiguity finds different embodiments in different circumstances. Therefore, it would be very difficult ...
Read More
As a communicative-epistemological concept, ambiguity is pivotal to any discussion of reading. Due to its roots in different fields of knowledge, as well as its dependence on age, genre, style, etc., ambiguity finds different embodiments in different circumstances. Therefore, it would be very difficult to discuss the concept without delimiting it to specific ages or genres. This paper is a meta-commentary on “The Function of Ambiguity in the Process of Reading Texts” by Forough Sahba. Via her analysis of some modernist and postmodernist narratives, Sahba has argued that despite the theory of the death of the author, modernist and postmodernist uses of ambiguity show the centrality of the author. The book is informative and especially helpful in defining different types of ambiguity. However, it has some shortcomings: it has no literature review; its classifications of ambiguity are not satisfying; and it has a few inconsistencies in its form and content. Moreover, it is based on a contradictory claim.
