Critical-Documentary Analysis of Explainingthe Concept of the Fourth Paradigm of Management inthe Islamic World with A Review of the Book"The Influence of Islamic Values on Management Practice"

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 * PhD Student, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Industrial Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Quranic Sciences and Hadith, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Student, Department of Quranic Sciences and Hadith, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
In today's era, organizations are one of the main foundations of society and their management is the most important factor in their life, growth, and development. Managers use a set of management approaches to manage organizations efficiently. Many factors influence these approaches, and Islamic values are also among these influential factors in Islamic societies. Following the study of the influence of Islamic values, Gillian Forester has compiled a book called "The Influence of Islamic Values on Management Practice". Accordingly, the purpose of this article is a deep analysis of this book. Since this book has not been translated in Iran, the criticism of this book can open a way to remove the ambiguity and clarify the thinking of the author of this book. For this purpose, relying on the documentary method, in the first step, the book is examined from the point of view of content and then from the point of view of structure. After the investigations, the points that can be developed in the book have been mentioned in order to enrich and improve it in the next editions.
Introduction
This study offers a critical review of Gillian Forster’s “The Influence of Islamic Values on Management Practices”, a book that examines the relationship between Islamic values, cultural context, and managerial behavior in Morocco and the broader Arab world. The reviewed work is significant because it attempts to move beyond universalistic management models and explore how religion, national culture, gender, colonial legacy, and social norms shape organizational practices in a specific Arab-Islamic context. This article has been developed in line with a critical review of the book and seeks to evaluate its theoretical and methodological contributions to the field of Islamic management studies.

Materials & Methods
The article adopts a documentary and analytical approach, using the book itself as the main source of data. The analysis is structured around three levels: content review, methodological review, and critical assessment of the book’s innovations and shortcomings. First, the book’s chapters are summarized to provide a clear picture of its overall architecture, including the introduction, the Moroccan socio-cultural context, the discussion of Islamic values, the theoretical framing of management in the Arab world, and the findings based on fieldwork. Second, the methodological foundations of the book are examined through the lens of major approaches to Islamic management, including inferential, reformist, and foundational perspectives. Based on this framework, the book is positioned within an integrative and interpretive methodological orientation, relying on qualitative inquiry and purposive sampling.
The reviewed book uses interviews with 24 senior managers in Moroccan and multinational organizations, organized through a funnel-shaped qualitative structure and coded through open and selective coding. The article assesses this design as a meaningful attempt to capture lived managerial experience, while also noting the need for deeper case-based evidence and more explicit discussion of limitations. The review further evaluates whether the book’s arguments remain faithful to Islamic textual sources, especially the Qur’an and Sunnah, and whether its claims about concepts such as consultation, gender, leadership, and values are adequately supported by primary religious and empirical evidence.

Discussion & Result
The review finds that the book’s main strength lies in its broad and multi-layered treatment of management in Morocco. It does not reduce management to technical procedures; rather, it situates managerial practice within a wider matrix of Islamic values, family structures, colonial history, education, gender relations, and Arab cultural identity. This contextual depth is one of the book’s most valuable contributions. The discussion of Morocco as a social and cultural setting is especially useful because it demonstrates how management cannot be understood apart from historical and civilizational background. Likewise, the book’s effort to derive Islamic values from the Qur’an and integrate them with management theory is a noteworthy contribution to the field of Islamic management studies.
Another major contribution is the proposal of a “fourth paradigm,” which attempts to reinterpret management through the intersection of religion, culture, and gender. This paradigm is particularly relevant for understanding the participation of women in Arab organizations and the role of patriarchal cultural structures in shaping managerial opportunities. The book also presents a useful exploratory framework and combines field insights with theoretical literature, thereby generating a richer understanding of management than conventional quantitative studies often provide. In this sense, the work contributes to knowledge production by linking practice with theory and by identifying a gap between formal academic discourse and the lived reality of managers.
At the same time, the review identifies several limitations. The relatively small sample size of 24 managers restricts the generalizability of the findings. The book also lacks deeper case studies and more concrete examples showing how Islamic values actually influence decision-making, leadership, and organizational culture. In some sections, the relationship between Islamic principles and practical managerial outcomes remains underdeveloped. Moreover, certain interpretive claims, especially those concerning Qur’anic and exegetical issues, require greater precision and stronger scholarly grounding. The review therefore concludes that although the book is intellectually ambitious and conceptually innovative, it would benefit from sharper empirical support, clearer distinction between Islamic teachings and cultural practices, and more nuanced treatment of internal tensions within the Moroccan and broader Arab context.

Conclusion
Overall, the book represents an important step in Islamic management scholarship because it explores the possibility of building a culturally grounded and value-oriented management model for Arab societies. Its most important achievement is that it challenges imported managerial frameworks and proposes a context-sensitive understanding of organizational life. However, its theoretical claims would be stronger if supported by richer empirical evidence, more rigorous source criticism, and a more explicit analysis of the practical implications of Islamic values. The review ultimately shows that the book succeeds as an exploratory and thought-provoking study, but it also leaves room for future research to refine the conceptual model, expand the evidence base, and further develop the relationship between Islamic ethics, organizational leadership, and gender-sensitive management.

Keywords

Subjects

The Holy Quran.
Aghamohammadi, J. (2017). Presenting a Framework for Explaining Managers' Indicators Based on Islamic Criteria Using Research Synthesis Method. Quarterly Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Management Studies, 6(12), 41–62. [In Persian]
Al-Baydawi, Abdullah ibn Umar. (1997). Anwar al-Tanzil wa Asrar al-Ta'wil. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, 1st ed. [In Persian]
Al-Maturidi, Muhammad ibn Muhammad. (2005). Ta'wilat Ahl al-Sunnah. Investigated by Majdi Basloum, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1st ed. [In Persian]
Al-Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir. (1992). Jami' al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah, 1st ed. [In Persian]
Al-Tabarsi, Fadl ibn Hasan. (1993). Majma' al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran. Edited by Fadlullah Yazdi Tabatabaei & Hashem Rasouli Mahallati, Tehran: Naser Khosrow, 3rd ed. [In Persian]
Al-Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hasan. (n.d.). Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir al-Quran. Edited by Ahmad Habib Ameli, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, 1st ed. [In Persian]
Arefijoo, M. (2026). Identification and Analysis of Human Resource Management Functions in the Light of Islamic Values Using a Meta-Synthesis Approach. Education, Training and Sustainable Development, 1–17. [In Persian]
Azami, A., & Pesaran Ghader, M. (2013). Islamic Management Research: Adaptation, Damages, and Solutions. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University. [In Persian]
Bagheri, N. (2009). A Critique of the Book "Islamic Management" by Hojjat-al-Islam Mohammad Hossein Nabavi. Padang, 63(6), 169-191. [In Persian]
Daroudi, M. (2016). The Political Function of Religious Delegations in Iran (With an Emphasis on the Era of the Islamic Republic of Iran). Tarih-Nameh Enghelab (Revolution History Journal), 2(2-3), 67-93. [In Persian]
Esmaeili, R. (2011). The Principle of Social Justice in Islamic Management and Its Indicators. Marefat Quarterly, 20(12), 43-60. [In Persian]
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, Muhammad ibn Umar. (1999). Al-Tafsir al-Kabir (Mafatih al-Ghayb). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, 3rd ed. [In Persian]
Goodarzi, G., & Moeini Karbakandi, M. (2021). A Critique of the Book "Islamic Management (Models and Obstacles to Its Realization in Society and Organizations)". Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 21(3), 279-297. [In Persian]
Goodarzi, G., & Moeini Karbakandi, M. (2022). A Critique of the Book "Organizational Change and Transformation: Foundations and Consequences". Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 22(5), 437-463. [In Persian]
Hassani Moghaddam, S., Tavallaei, R., Goodarzi, G., & Babaei, M. (2021). Application of Meta-Theoretical Approach in the Critique and Review of Islamic Management Books (Case Study: "Islamic Management" by Seyed Ali-Akbar Afjei). Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 21(3), 69-92. [In Persian]
Khaki, G. (2000). Research Methodology in Management. Tehran: Islamic Azad University - Scientific Publications Center. [In Persian]
Khanifar, H. (2005). Content Analysis of Islamic Management Literature with an Emphasis on Selected Works. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 3(3), 151-201. [In Persian]
Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (1997). Prerequisites of Islamic Management. Qom: Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute. [In Persian]
Moghimi, S. M. (2023). Principles and Fundamentals of Management from the Perspective of Islam. Negah Publications. [In Persian]
Nabavi, M. H. (2000). Islamic Management. Qom: Bustan-e Ketab. [In Persian]
Ostadi, R., & Tavallaei, R. (2021). A Critique of the Book "Principles of Islamic Management and Its Models" Using the Documentary Method. Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 21(3), 29-49. [In Persian]
Razi, A. (2009). Indicators for Evaluating and Critiquing University Textbooks. Research and Writing of Academic Books, 14(21), 21-30. [In Persian]
Sadeghi Fasaei, S., & Erfanmanesh, I. (2015). Methodological Foundations of Documentary Research in Social Sciences; Case Study: The Effects of Modernization on the Iranian Family. Rahbord-e Farhang (Culture Strategy) Quarterly, 8(29), 61-91. [In Persian]
Salari, Y., Moradi, A., & Salari, S. F. (2024). Anthropology and Islamic Values in Islamic Management. 19th National Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting, Shirvan. [In Persian]
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan Harandi, A., & Hejazi, E. (2006). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Zamani, M., Najjari, R., & Abedi Jafari, H. (2023). Introducing the Exploratory Textual Research Method: A Critique on Islamic Management Research Methods. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(114), 53-71. [In Persian]
 
Volume 26, Issue 1 - Serial Number 123
Spring 2026
Spring 2026
Pages 179-207

  • Receive Date 31 December 2025
  • Revise Date 19 March 2026
  • Accept Date 22 April 2026