Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences)

Text, Ego and “People” in Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’s Interpretations

Document Type : Research

Author

Maziar MOHAYMENI

Assistant Professor of French Language and LiteratureBu-Ali Sina University

Abstract
The Blind Owl of Hedayat, The Heavenly Kingdom of Bahram Sadeghi, poems of Sohrab Sepehri are Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’s efforts to access some personal writing through an interpretation of these works which are fundamentally paradoxical. If the “second” character of interpretation writing is not in opposition to the writer’s aspiration to singularity, the dispersion of interpretation text would be a proof of the absence of the consciousness which assumes the innovatory order of speech and the original recomposition of knowledge. Ghiassi’s ego is too ingrained in his lent science to manipulate it. The elementary image of this science in the text shows the ego’s disability in appropriation and subjectivity of a reason reached by the other in a step of his transcendental suspension. Ghiassi’s interpretations search for their lever between two suspensions. His use of French theories for interpreting Iranian works is not for the purpose. The intention is to speak about somewhat physical presence of his ego in the connecting process. This presence does not unify the text; moreover, it enfeebles its consistency. There is no organic connection between the works and the theories. The unique connecting element is ego, which cries its singularity in the climax of its dependence in someone else’s speech. Belief in the superiority of the speechless ego over the silent people seems paradoxical where the learned reason of ego is inclined to vulgarity.

Keywords

Ego
Text
People
Reading
Personal Writing
Second Writing
Mohammad Taghi Ghiass

Subjects

احدیان، پریسا (1395)، «دیدار و گفت‌‌وگو با محمدتقی غیاثی»، مجلۀ فرهنگی و هنری بخارا:.
احمدی، بابک (1375)، ساختار و تأویل متن، تهران: مرکز.
بارت، رولان (1382)، نقد و حقیقت، ترجمة شیرین‌‌دخت دقیقیان، تهران: مرکز.
بهره‌‌مند، شیما (3 خرداد 1395)، «ادبیات یعنی یکه‌خوردن» (گفت‌وگو با محمدتقی غیاثی، به‌مناسبت بازنشر دو کتاب هفتۀ مقدس و خدایان تشنه‌اند)، روزنامۀ شرق، ش 2589: <http://www.sharghdaily.ir/News/93420>.
صادقی، بهرام (1357)، ملکوت، تهران: زمان.
غیاثی، محمدتقی (1381)، تأویل بوف کور: قصۀ زندگی، تهران: نیلوفر.
غیاثی، محمدتقی (1385)، شعر فرانسه در سدۀ بیستم، تهران: ناهید.
غیاثی، محمدتقی (1386)، تأویل ملکوت: قصۀ اجتماعی ـ سیاسی، تهران: نیلوفر.
غیاثی، محمدتقی (1387)، معراج شقایق: تحلیل ساختاری شعر سهراب سپهری، تهران: مروارید.
فرزانه، م. ف. (1376)، آشنایی با صادق هدایت، تهران: مرکز.
هدایت، صادق (1356)، بوف کور، تهران: جاویدان.
Aucouturier, Michel (1978), “Mikhaïl Bakhtine Philosophe et Théoricien du Roman, in: Mikhaïl Bakhtine, Esthétique et théorie du roman, tr. fr. D. Olivier, Paris: Gallimard.
Benjamin, Walter (2000), “La Tâche du traducteur”, in: Œuvres I, tr. fr. M. de Gandillac, R. Rochlitz et P. Rusch, Paris: Gallimard (folio essais).
Berman, Antoine (1995), Pour une critique des traductions: John Donne, Paris: Gallimard.
Blanchot, Maurice (2002), “Michel Foucault tel que je l’imagine”, in: Une Voix venue d’ailleurs, Paris: Gallimard.
Fontanille, Jacques (1987), Le Savoir partagé. Sémiotique et théorie de la connaissance chez Marcel Proust, Paris-Amsterdam: Hadès-Benjamins.
Fontanille, Jacques (1998), Sémiotique du discours, Limoges: PULIM.
Fontanille, Jacques (1999), Sémiotique et littérature. Essais de méthode, Paris: PUF.
Foucault, Michel (1966), Les Mots et les choses, Paris: Gallimard.
Genette, Gérard (1966), “Structuralisme et critique littéraire”, in: Figures I, Paris: Seuil (points).
Jacques, Francis (1985), L’Espace logique de l’interlocution, Paris: PUF.
Jakobson, Roman (1963), Essais de linguistique générale, Paris: Minuit.
Kristeva, Julia (1970), “Une poétique ruinée”, in: Mikhaïl Bakhtine, La Poétique de Dostoïevski, tr. fr. I. Kolitcheff, Paris: Seuil (points).
Kristeva, Julia (1987), Soleil noir. Dépression et Mélancolie, Paris: Gallimard.
Lederer, Marianne (ed.) (2006), Le Sens en traduction, Caen: Lettres Modernes Minard.

  • Receive Date 31 December 2017
  • Revise Date 06 February 2018
  • Accept Date 02 March 2018

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us