Document Type : Research

Author

Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Member of the Iranian Council for Reviwing Books and Texts in Human Sciences, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz

Abstract

Although hedonistic and some other self-beneficial and pleasure-seeking approaches towards a text are assumed to be subjective, those who aim at dealing with textual exegesis, and publishing the resultant text in the public domain undertake a responsibility for which they must accept some requirements necessary to the successful accomplishment of the task. Exegetes should know the text well and get acquainted with it thoroughly. To achieve a reliable, revised, or edited version, exegetes should exert themselves in laborious task of revising. They should be sensitive, precise, and strict during the task of reading; furthermore, in case of encountering with any linguistic or metrical heterogeneities (in poetical texts) or any alternations regarding the internal logic of the main text, they should not rely on their self-reading of the text; instead, they should try to unravel the problem through continual and repeated rereading, referring to dictionary and other related resources, note-taking from corrected and revised versions, and consulting experts of the field. The above-mentioned procedure will be fruitful when exegetes acquire the necessary requirements for textual interpretation and mastery in related fields. One should not surmise that proficiency and expertise in a discipline of Humanities ensure mastery in all of the related domains; this kind of complacency, especially amongst those who are assumed to be authorities of the field, is not acceptable at all. The current paper, as a pioneering model, intends to analyze and criticize Gholamhussain Dinani’s reading of Rumi’s ghazals from various angles of vision, namely, the reliability of the text as a sourcebook, the correct reading, the way of dealing with problems confronted as a result of inadequate knowledge about the mentality and language of the main author, and exegete’s explanations about the literary content.

Keywords

Main Subjects

حافظ شیرازی، شمس‌الدین محمد (1367)، دیوان، به‌اهتمام محمد قزوینی و قاسم غنی، تهران: کتاب‌فروشی زوّار.
خراسانی، حاج میرزا حبیب (1361)، دیوان، به‌اهتمام علی حبیب، تهران: کتاب‌فروشی زوّار.
رودکی، ابوعبدالله جعفر بن محمد (1382)، محیط زندگی و احوال و اشعار رودکی، تصحیح سعید نفیسی، تهران: امیرکبیر.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا (1387)، غزلیات شمس تبریز، مقدمه، گزینش، و تفسیر، تهران: سخن.
فروزانفر، بدیع‌الزمان (1381)، احادیث و قصص مثنوی، ترجمۀ کامل و تنظیم مجدد حسین داودی، تهران: امیرکبیر.
فیضی، کریم (1389)، شعاع شمس؛ غزلیات شمس تبریزی بهروایت دکتر دینانی، تهران: اطلاعات.
مولوی، جلال‌الدین محمد بلخی (1363 الف)، کلیات شمس تبریزی یا دیوان کبیر، با تصحیحات و حواشیِ استاد بدیع‌الزمان فروزانفر، تهران: امیرکبیر.
مولوی، جلال‌الدین محمد بلخی (1363 ب)، مثنوی، تصحیح نیکلسون، به‌کوشش نصرالله پورجوادی، تهران: امیرکبیر.