Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences)

The Criticism of The Routledge Companion to Semiotics Translation: From Hard Semiotics to Anthroposemiotics

Document Type : Research

Authors

Hamid Reza Shairi 1
Fatemeh Seyedebrahimi 2

1 Professor of French Langauge and Literature, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of English Language Department, Sirjan Branch, Islamic Azad University

https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2020.30823.1843
Abstract
 
The book The Routledge Companion to Semiotics is a collection of articles published under the supervision of Paul Cobley. Raheleh Ghasemi and Siyahrood publication have translated and published it alternatively. This book contains ten chapters, and the main issue of the chapters is the interaction of semiotics with the environmental world and the experience of presence. The authors of this book share one point: immanent structures cannot meet the needs of the domain of semiotics studies, and it is necessary that the world’s practical realities be translated or transmitted to the sign system. For this reason, the cultural, social, biological and ethical elements have been introduced in interaction with the world of signs in this book. Although the theoretical viewpoints presented are good and understandable, they do not encounter us with the pattern of studies that can be used in the design and research in human issues, especially anthroposemiotics. Our main goal is to show how we pass through the hard semiotics into anthroposemiotics. Our method is based on practical semiotics and semiotics of discourse. The most important achievement of this research is studying the role of phenomenological and cultural pragmatics in the evolution of semiotics.

Keywords

Semiotics
Environmental World
Experience of Presence
Cultural Elements
Paul Cobley

Subjects

کوبلی، پاول (1395)، سیر نشانه‌شناسی، ترجمۀ راحله قاسمی، تهران: سیاه‌رود.
گرمس، آلژیرداس ژولین (1398)، نقصان معنا، عبور از روایت‌‌شناسی ساختارگرا: زیبایی‌شناسی حضور، ترجمۀ حمیدرضا شعیری، تهران: خاموش.
 
Cobley, P. (2001), The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics,London: Routledge.
Eco, U. (1985), La Guerre du Faux, Paris: Grasset.
Favareau, D., P. Cobley, and Kalevi Kull (2012), A More Developed Sign: Interpreting the Work of Jesper Hoffmeyer, Tartu: University Press.
Fontanille, J. (1999), Sémiotique du Discours, Limoges: PULIM.
Fontanille, J. and N. Couégnas (2018), Terre de Sens: Essai d’Anthroposémiotique, Limoges: PULIM.
Foucault, M. (2010), L’Archéologie du Savoir, Paris, Gallimard, 1969, A. M. Lorusso, Semiotica della Cultura, Rome-Bari: Laterza.
Greimas, A. J. (1987), De l’Imperfection, Perigueux: Pierre Fanlac.
Greimas, A. J. and J. Courtés (1993), “Sémiotique”, Dictionnaire Raisonné de la Théorie du Langage, Paris: Hachette.
Lévina , E. (2001), Totalité et Infini: Essai sur l’extériorité [1961], Paris: Librairie Générale Française (Le Livre de Poche).
Peirce, C. S. (1992), Reasoning and the Logic of Things, K. L. Ketner and H. Putnam(eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (2001), Global Semiotics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Spiegelberg, H. (1975), “Husserl’s and Peirce’s Phenomenologies: Coincidence or Interaction?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, no. 17.
Uexkull, J. von (1982 [1940]), “The Theory of Meaning”, Semiotica, vol. 42, no. 1).

  • Receive Date 17 October 2020
  • Revise Date 20 January 2021
  • Accept Date 20 February 2021

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us