Document Type : Research

Authors

• Amir Falakedin ¹
• Masoud Ghasemi ²
• Yazdan Nosrati ²

¹ PhD Student of Criminal and Criminology, Kermanshah Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Kermanshah Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Following the methods of differentiation (specialization) in criminal law is a necessary thing that has been achieved in many other legal systems. One of the areas in which the differentiation of criminal procedure should be manifested in its territory is technical and specialized crimes, and this study has examined one of the green crimes as one of its examples. In this study, it was concluded that in our systemic law, there are manifestations of differentiation from private to technical and specialized crimes in the form of specialized courts, but since terrorism is still achieved in our systemic law. The independent form of criminalization is also assigned to the trial and has special regulations, there is a serious weakness in our legislative system. In addition to the effects, the anticipation of requirements such as increasing the number of specialized green courts and specialized courts and eliminating specialized courts in dealing with green crimes, the use of specialized judges and officers, and the Special Police for Environmental and Continuing Education. Their recognition of the right to reason and objection to votes for green poison can be used to differentiate between green crimes and the realization of real criminal policy.

Keywords

• Green Crimes
• Environmental Terrorism
• Differential Treatment
• Specialized Courts
• Specialist Judges

Main Subjects

• Jurisprudence and Law