عنوان مقاله [English]
Structuralism and poststructuralism are two of the most important and influential approaches in the humanities of the 20th century. This two approaches, are arose in response to special situation in philosophy and humanities and so they have to pay attention. The main question of this article is to survey of benefits and weaknesses in this book by critical descriptive method. It should be noted that this study was conducted in accordance with structuralist and poststructuralist theories and this book studied in three phases: Methodological, formal and content review phase. The books in this field, usually, are translated in Persian language but this book is an essay, so the purpose of this article is review of this book as an essay book .The most important value of this book is the novelty of the subject. Also, this book has its drawbacks of writing issues and punctuation. Great emphasis on philosophical issues, extension of opinion of structuralists and poststructuralists in different contexts of humanities, failure to presentation of historical philosophy content properly, redundant repetition and inconsistency, are the other flaws in the book include.