Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences)

A Critical Review on the Book Vernacular Modernity and The Rethinking of History

Document Type : Research

Authors

Mansour Tabiee 1
Ali Mozafari 2

1 Assistant Professor, Political Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate of Political Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran,

https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2024.46633.2778
Abstract
Discussing the national identity of Iranians, drawing its image, and criticizing its foundations have been among the controversial academic topics in recent decades. This controversial dialogue, especially in the shadow of the emergence of the theories called postmodernism, has opened new points of view in historiography and has prompted some people to critically look at the conventional narratives of Iranian history through the lens of these new perspectives and reveal their weaknesses. In this article, we have chosen one of the most referenced works of this kind of research; That is, “Vernacular Modernity and the Rethinking of History” written by Mohammad Tavakoli Targhi. We have shown that this compilation, despite relying on first-hand sources and their innovative reading, has theoretical and methodological flaws. To describe the shortcomings in independent chapters, we have criticized the form, theoretical foundations, and methodology of the work and tried to show to what extent these weaknesses affect the acceptance of the research results. Based on this study, it seems that the main shortcoming in the theoretical plan of the book is that it has not given a clear definition of tradition. Such ambiguity in the definition of tradition has influenced various aspects and has made it difficult to accept its arguments.

Keywords

National Identity
Historical Rethinking
Modernity
Iranian History
Vernacular Modernity

Subjects

Abadian, H. (2009), “Narrative and Historical Meta-Narrative in the Thought of Jalal al-Din Mirza Qajar”, Farhang, vol. 68, 1-40.
Adamiyat, F. (1978), Thoughts of Mirza Agha Khan Kermani, Payam.
Gillespie, M. A. (2008), The Theological Origins of Modernity, University of Chicago Press.
Kashani-sabet, F. (2011), Conceiving Citizens: Women and the Politics of Motherhood in Iran, Oxford University Press.
Kilcullen, J. and J. Robinson (2019), “Medieval Political Philosophy”, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019), E. N. Zalta (ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Oberman, H. A. (2004), The Reformation: Roots and Ramifications, T and T Clark International.
Parhizgar, M. A. (2015), “The History of the Claims of Mahdism, Rejection of Islam and the Divinity of the Babiyat Leaders in the Movements of Horufiyeh and Noqtaviyeh”, Entezār-e Mow’ud, vol. 49, 129-146.
Ranger, T. O. and E. J. Hobsbawm (1993), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge University Press.
Shokri, H. (2019), “Azarkeyvan: Life, Character, Opinions, and Judgments of Others about Him”, IranNamag, vol. 4.
Varavini, S. (1984), Marzban Nameh, Beheshti University.
Vaziri, M. (2013), Iran as Imagined Nation (Second edition), Gorgias Press.
Vejdani, F. (2014), Making History in Iran: Education, Nationalism, and Print Culture, Stanford University Press.
Zekavati Qaragozlu, A. (1997), “Horufiyeh Prelude to Noqtaviyeh”, Ma’aref, vol. 40, 61-66.
Zekavati Qaragozlu, A. (2004), Noqtaviyeh Movement, Adyan.
Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2016), The Emergence of Iranian Nationalism: Race and the Politics of Dislocation, Columbia University Press.
 

  • Receive Date 30 March 2024
  • Revise Date 26 May 2024
  • Accept Date 14 July 2024

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us