نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 استاد گروه فلسفه دانشکده ادبیات فارسی و زبان های خارجی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The issue of recognizing external objects in modern philosophy, especially with the denial of the distinction between primary and secondary qualities, has become a fundamental problem. In this context, Kant, in his transcendental idealism, sought to explain external objects based on the necessary unity of consciousness; for him, the object is the product of the self-consciousness's determination of sensory data. Concepts and categories of understanding serve as expressions of this unity of self-consciousness, acting as a formal judgment that is applied to the diverse material of the senses and provides representational objects in experience. However, Hegel, in his "Phenomenology of Spirit," offered a different explanation of how objectivity is constituted, not based on reliance on sensory data. He initially critiqued Kant's transcendental self-consciousness, explaining that the relationship between self-consciousness and the world is not immediate but is mediated through "desire" and ultimately through the "Other." This article aims to examine how "desire" signifies self-consciousness and then, through it, the essential role of the "Other" in the formation of self-consciousness. Finally, by providing an analysis of the dialectic of master and slave, it will demonstrate how the concept of "work" in the slave plays a key role in the constitution of objectivity in Hegelian idealism through the subject's objectification of its content and its recognition by the "Other."
کلیدواژهها English
