شریفیان، فریدون (1394)، «جدال‌های پارادایمی در برنامۀ درسی و تحلیل جریان نومفهوم‌سازی از منظر ادعای جابهجایی پارادایم»، پژوهش‌های برنامۀ درسی، دورۀ 4، ش 1، 1-22.
شریفیان، فریدون و محمود مهرمحمدی (1393)، «تبیین قابلیت‌های دیسیپلینی برنامۀ درسی و تعیین جایگاه آن در طبقه‌بندی دیسیپلین‌های علمی»، دوفصلنامۀ نظریه و عمل در برنامۀ درسی، دورۀ 2، ش 4، 161-184.
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1382)، برنامۀ درسی: نظرگاه‌ها، رویکردها، و چشم‌اندازها، مشهد: بهنشر.
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1392)، «تأملی بر مقولۀ تولید و تدوین برنامۀ درسی با تأکید بر اندیشۀ آیزنر: مأموریت منسوخ یا معتبر در رشتۀ برنامۀ درسی؟»، رویکردهای نوین آموزشی، دورۀ 17، ش 1، 1-20.
مهرمحمدی، محمود و مقصود امین خندقی (1387)، «مقایسۀ ایدئولوژیهای برنامۀ درسی آیزنر با میلر: نگاهی دیگر»، مطالعات تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه فردوسی، دورۀ 1، ش 10، 141-157.
Alexander, K. and M. Day (eds.) (1992), Discipline-Based Art Education; A Curriculum Sampler, New York: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, R. and K. Coate (2005), Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education, Maidenhead: SRHE/ Open University Press.
Beauchamp, G. A. (1981), Curriculum Theory, Itasca, Ill: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
Connelly, F. M. (2009), “Being Practical With Schwab: Research and Teaching in The Foothills of Curriculum”, in: Proceedings of The Practical: An East-West Curriculum Dialogue, First International Conference on “The Practical” Curriculum, Beijing: Capital Normal University.
Dewey, J. (1997), Experience and Education, New York: The Free Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1971), Confronting Curriculum Reform, Boston, Little Brown.
Eisner, E. W. (1972), Educating Artistic Vision, New York, Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1979), The Educational Imagination: on The Design and Evaluation of School Programs, New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1982), Cognition and Curriculum: a Basis for Deciding What to Teach, New York: Longman.
Eisner, E. W. (1985), The Art of Educational Evaluation: a Personal View, London: Falmer Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1985), The Educational Imagination: on The Design and Evaluation of School Programs, New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1988), The Role of Discipline-Based Art Education in American Schools, Los Angeles: Paul Getty Trust.
Eisner, E. W. (1991), The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice, New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1994), The Educational Imagination: on The Design and Evaluation of School Programs, New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1994), Cognition and Curriculum Reconsidered, 2e, New York: Teachers College Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1998), The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice, Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Merrill.
Eisner, E. W. (1998), The Kind of Schools We Need: Personal Essays, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Eisner, E. W. (2001), “From Episteme to Phronesis to Artistry in the Study and Improvement of Teaching”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 18, 375–385
Eisner, E. W. and D. W. Ecker (1966), Readings in Art Education, Waltham, Mass. Blaisdell Pub. Co.
Eisner, E. W. and A. Peshkin (1990), Qualitative Inquiry in Education: the Continuing Debate, New York: Teachers College Press.
Eisner, E. W. and E. Vallance (1974), Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum, Berkeley, Calif. McCutchan Pub. Corp.
Eisner, E. W. (2002), Educational Imagination On The Design and Evalution of School Programs, Third Edition, Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Fox, S. (1985), “The Vitality of Theory in Schwab's Conception of the Practical”, Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 15, no. 1.
Fraser, S. P. and A. M. Bosanquet (2006), “The Curriculum? That’s just a Unit Outline, Isn’t It?”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 3, 269-284.
Greene, M. (1988), The Dialectic of Freedom, New York, Teachers College Press.
Grumet, M. (1987), “The Politics of Personal Knowledge”, Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 17, no. 3, 319–329, issues (4th ed.), Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
MMcLaughlin, W. M. (1976), “Implementation as Mutual Adaptation”, Teachers College Record, vol. 77, no. 3, 339-351, Available at:
˂online at http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/jaaacs/vol2/pinar_exile.htm˃.
Palmer, P. C. (1998), The Courage To Teach, Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher’s Life, San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Pinar, W. (1977), The Reconceptualization of Curriculum Studies, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Pinar, W. F. (2006 a), The Synoptic Text Today and Other Essays: Curriculum Development after Reconceptualization, New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F (2006 b), “Exile and Estrangement in the Internationalization of Curriculum Studies”, Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, vol. 2.
Pinar, W. F. (1979), “What is the Reconceptualization?”, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, vol. 1, no. 1, 93-104.
Pinar, W. F. (2001), The Gender of Racial Politics and Violence in America, New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (2004), What is Curriculum Theory? Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Pinar, W. F. (2007), Intellectual Advancement through Disciplinarily; Verticality and Horizontality in Curriculum Studies, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Pinar, W. F. (2008), “Curriculum Theory since 1950, Crisis, Reconceptualization, Internationalization”, in: The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction, M. Connelly, H. Fang, and J. Phillion, J. (eds.), (491-513), Los Angeles: Sage.
Pinar, W. F. (2009 a), The Worldliness of a Cosmopolitan Education: Passionate Lives in Public Service, New York: Routledge.
Pinar, W. F. (2009 b), “Interview”, in: Whole, Bright, Deep with Understanding; Life Story and Politics of Curriculum Studies, J. A. Pacheco (ed.), In-between William Pinar and Ivor Goodson (pp.111-139), Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Pinar, W. F. (2010 a), “The Next Moment”, in: Curriculum Studies Handbook, E. Malewski (ed.), The Next Moment (pp. 528-533), New York: Routledge.
Pinar, W. F. (2010 b), “The Primacy of the Particular”, in: Curriculum Studies Handbook: The Next Moment, E. Malewski (ed.), (pp. 143-152), New York: Routledge.
Pinar, W. F. (2010 c), “The Eight-Year Study”, Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 40, no. 2, 295-316.
Pinar, W. F. (ed.). (1975), Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Pinar, W. F. et al. (eds.) (1995), Understanding Curricu Lum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses, New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (1999), “Response: Gracious submission”, Educational Researcher, vol. 28, 14-15.
Pinar, W. et al. (2004), Understanding Curriculum, An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses, New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (2010), “Introduction”, in: Curriculum Studies in South Africa: Intellec tual Histories and Present Circumstances, W. F. Pinar (ed.), (pp. 1-18), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Portelli, J. P. (1987), “On Defining Curriculum”, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, vol. 2, no. 4, 354-367.
Schwab, J. (1969), “The Practical: A Language for Curriculum”, School Review, vol. 78, 1-23.
Schwab, J. (1971), “The Practical II: Arts of Eclectic”, School Review, vol. 79, 493-542.
Schwab, J. (1973), “The Practical 3: Translation Into Curriculum”, School Review, vol. 81, 501-522.
Schwab, J. (1983), “The Practical 4: Something for Curriculum Professors to Do”, Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 13, no. 3, 239-265.
Short, E. C. (ed.) (1991), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry, SUNY Press: NY.
Shulman, L. (1983), “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform”, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 57, 1-22.
Tyler, R. W. (1948), Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction: Syllabus for Education 360, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Uhrmacher, P. B. (2001), “Elliot Eisner”, in: Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education: From Piaget to the Present, J. A. Palmer (ed.), London: Routledge.
Walker, D. (1971), “A Naturalistic for Curriculum Development”, School Review, vol. 6, no. 3, 5165.
)